[itdiscuss] FW: Do You Know Anything About...

Steve smwalsman at gmail.com
Wed Sep 17 18:59:12 EDT 2008


Tony -

You had said Data Domain - don't forget to look at the EMC EDL.

http://www.emc.com/products/detail/hardware/disk-library-3d-1500.htm

On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Allen Madding <amadding at xcentricgroup.com>wrote:

> I don't. SQL would have been a great solution for the issues we
> encountered.
>
> Allen
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discuss-bounces at itdiscuss.org [mailto:discuss-bounces at itdiscuss.org]
> On Behalf Of Stephen Ollis
> Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 3:39 PM
> To: discuss at itdiscuss.org
> Subject: Re: [itdiscuss] FW: Do You Know Anything About...
>
> Hi Allen,
>
> Do you recall what version you were using? We've not had any issue like
> that in the past 3 years. I'll have to check but I think we pointed bakbone
> to sql for its db, but I,ll check that.
>
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Steve Ollis
> Manager, Technology Services
> Hillsong Church, Sydney
>
> Sent from my Blackberry Pearl
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: discuss-bounces at itdiscuss.org <discuss-bounces at itdiscuss.org>
> To: IT Discussion Forum <discuss at itdiscuss.org>
> Sent: Wed May 07 01:51:56 2008
> Subject: Re: [itdiscuss] FW: Do You Know Anything About...
>
> We installed and ran Backbone Netvault  when I worked at the insurance
> company a few years back. We discovered that the backup system relies on a
> in-house written database for storing the backup jobs, cataloging tapes,
> configuring the library, etc. The unfortunate part of this is that the
> database is some what fragile and easily corrupted. If the NetVault service
> is not stopped from within the NetVault software before a server reboot, it
> will corrupt the database. Even stopping the service from the services mmc
> will corrupt the database. I found this to be a huge issue and on multiple
> occasions had to rebuild from scratch. And because we were utilizing disk to
> disk (virtual tapes) for backups, rebuilding from scratch took a couple of
> hours and would lose all of our historical information on what tape was
> offsite, due for re-use, etc causing us to have to rescan all of the tapes
> that were in rotation. After a year of struggling with it, we abandon the
> product and went back to BackupExec.
>
>
>
> Allen Madding
>
>
>
> From: discuss-bounces at itdiscuss.org [mailto:discuss-bounces at itdiscuss.org]
> On Behalf Of Dye, Tony
> Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 11:41 AM
> To: IT Discussion Forum
> Subject: [itdiscuss] FW: Do You Know Anything About...
>
>
>
> I'm looking for any information I can get on any of these products.  If you
> know something, good or bad, would you share?  Thanks!
>
>
>
>
> Do You Know Anything About... <
> http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Tonydye/~3/284609585/do-you-know-any.html>
>
>
> By TonyDye
>
> We're giving some serious consideration to some data management products.
>  I'm looking for any comments, good or bad, about any of them.  I'm wary of
> stepping into anything that no other church/ministry has used before, and at
> the same time, I realize this is some new territory.  Can you help me out?
>
> *       BakBone NetVault <http://www.bakbone.com/product.aspx?id=1304> .
>  Alternative: why not stay with BackupExec?
> *       C2C Archive One <
> http://www.c2c.com/site/products/archiveone/default.asp> .  Alternative:
> The Barracuda Message Archiver
> *       Moonwalk <http://www.moonwalkinc.com/> .  Alternatives: Arkivio,
> CaminoSoft, Enigma Data , SevenTen, probably others, all of whom I know even
> less about
> *       Data Domain <http://www.datadomain.com/> .  Alternatives: ExaGrid,
> SanMelody, and probably plenty of others
>
> If you have any horror stories, I'd sure rather hear them now.
>
>  <http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Tonydye/~4/284609585>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Scanned by the Xcentric Email Security system (
> http://www.xcentricgroup.com) ---
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> The material contained in this email may be confidential, and may also
> be the subject of copyright and/or privileged information. If you are
> not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this
> document is prohibited. If you have received this document in error,
> please advise the sender and delete the document.
>
> This email communication does not create or vary any contractual
> relationship between Hillsong and you. Internet communications are not
> secure and accordingly Hillsong does not accept any legal liability
> for the contents of this message.
>
> Please note that neither Hillsong nor the sender accepts any
> responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan the
> email and any attachments.
>
> Hillsong
> www.hillsong.com
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> _______________________________________________
> it discuss mailing list: discuss at itdiscuss.org
> Mailing List: http://itdiscuss.org/discuss
> Web Discussion Board: http://itdiscuss.org/discuss-forum
> Wiki: http://itdiscuss.org/wiki
> Internet Relay Chat: irc://irc.freenode.net/citrt
>
> --- Scanned by the Xcentric Email Security system (
> http://www.xcentricgroup.com) ---
> _______________________________________________
>  it discuss mailing list: discuss at itdiscuss.org
> Mailing List: http://itdiscuss.org/discuss
> Web Discussion Board: http://itdiscuss.org/discuss-forum
> Wiki: http://itdiscuss.org/wiki
> Internet Relay Chat: irc://irc.freenode.net/citrt
>



-- 
Steve Walsman
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://optimus.thompsonic.com/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20080917/5ef58ce3/attachment.htm 


More information about the discuss mailing list